What is Merge FE Column / Beam results with Example
How to merge the results from sub-frame analysis and results from the 3D building analysis?
After a model is completed, a building analysis is mandatory which will generate results for G and Q (including the pattern cases of G and Q) as well as lateral load cases. This will be followed by FE Chasedown analysis and only then the results can be merged.
Note that these options will only be available when FE chasedown analysis has performed for all storeys. (Select All Storeys > Check "Include Upper Storey Column Loads" > "Floor Mesh and Analysis").
Are they added up together simply by superposition?
When FE Analysis results are merged, ProtaStructure completely replaces unfactored load case results for G and Q (including the pattern cases of G and Q) of Building Analysis with the corresponding loadcase results of G and Q from the FE Chasedown analysis. This means that the final merged result will consist of gravity load cases (G & Q) derived from FE chasedown analysis while the results of lateral load cases will be from 3D building analysis.
Hence, the merging of results is not superimposition as we understand it, i.e. we are not discarding the smaller values of say G loadcase of Building Analysis and replacing it by a larger value of FE Analysis.
However, ProtaStructure always uses superposition to generate the results for design combinations. As such, if a conservative design is desirable, such as for design a transfer beam, it is possible to consider both Building Analysis and FE Chasedown analysis in the design of the members by :
- Run Building Analysis which will generate both gravity and lateral results
- Perform beam and/or column design.
- Run FE Chasedown which will generate different set of gravity loadcase results
- Merge FE Chasedown results with Building Analysis results
- Perform beam and/or column design using the design option to increase steel only when the previous steel is insufficient. Previous steel if sufficient would not be changed at all.
- For example, if the mid-span moment of the beam for FE Chasedown is found to be larger than that obtained from Building Analysis, the steel will be increased.
We will use a simple 2 storey structure similar to model used in the axial load comparison model as illustration.
"Merge Column/Beam Result with Building Analysis Results" should be unchecked before performing new round of building analysis. Else, the analysis result is wrong.
Related Articles
Difference between Building Analysis and FE Floor Analysis
This article explains the differences between Building Analysis and FE Floor Analysis & which method is suited for different structural system. The fundamental differences of the analytical model created are shown in the below diagram. For detail ...Yield Line and FE Load Decomposition with Example
For your best understanding to this topic, it is best to refer and relate to Modelling, Analysis & Design Flowchart before proceeding with this article. There are two methods to calculate concrete slab loads onto supporting reinforced concrete beams ...Define Wall/Column Lateral Loads
User-defined varying distributed lateral loads can be applied to the individual column and wall member. The span load applied maybe used to simulate : Soil Pressure on basement wall Hydrostatic load As an alternative to defining wind load (other than ...Column Punching Shear Checks to BS 8110 and Eurocode 2
The nature of the design code requirements tend to dictate that punching shear checks cannot be safely & fully automated in batch runs. For this reason, ProtaStructure’s punching shear check is an interactive design tool, you need to use it carefully ...Merge Building Models
Merge Building Models You can find the "Load Building Model" from BuildingSetout > Merge Building Models This function can be used to: Merge building blocks import axis system of another model import foundation columns/walls of another block for ...