Introduction
Staged construction analysis is a sophisticated method of solution which, if used with a reasonable degree of care can more closely reflect the real behaviour of the structure.
A standard 3D analysis takes no account of time dependant effects ‐ it assumes the structure has been constructed instantaneously. In the real world a concrete building has to be constructed in stages ‐ typically one floor at a time. Depending on the number of storeys within the building a significant period of time can elapse from the commencement of first floor to completion of the top floor.
Because concrete matures with time, this means that at the top floor the concrete has properties which ‘lag behind’ those of the first floor (and to a reducing degree each intermediate floor).
Another aspect of the staged nature of concrete construction is that any settlement of existing lower floors which takes place prior to the pouring of the current floor is allowed for on site when establishing the current floor level. This effect can not be allowed for in a standard 3D analysis, however it is catered for automatically in a staged construction analysis.
In ProtaStructure, only the final staged construction results are provided. The software does not display the intermediate model states or analysis results at each stage of the construction sequence.
A model consisting of two blocks is constructed as shown below. The first floor plan and loading is identical in both blocks. A second floor framework is added to the right hand block but with no imposed load applied to that level.
A standard 3D analysis can be performed for the above, in which all members are analysed simultaneously with all the loads applied.
A staged construction analysis can also be performed. If the option were selected to stage the imposed load only, the analysis would proceed as follows:
- In the first stage, only the first floors are analysed for their imposed load.
- In the second stage, the second floor is added and the analysis repeated (for the undeformed model) but this time only for the imposed load at second floor level.
- In this way, each stage can only affect the result in it’s own and previous stages.
In the unstaged result you can see that Q load applied at first floor is causing moments to develop in the structure above. If that frame existed when the load was applied then this is completely logical.
Results for Q ‐ Staged

In the staged result no moments develop in the frame above the first floor members and in fact the forces in the first floor structure are identical in the single storey frame and the two storey frame. This is logical if all the load is applied before the frame above exists AND assuming that all deflection is instantaneous.
The effect of creep is not considered in the above ‐ in reality the first floor beams would continue to deflect and the joints continue to rotate after the frame has been built and loaded. Therefore, although there are no moments in the second floor frame at the point at which it is constructed, the creep of the first floor structure should cause some moments to develop over time in the second floor.
Model Creation
No additional steps are required when creating a model for staged construction. Stages are created automatically, (each storey being treated as a separate stage). Stages can be adjusted once the model has been created as described in the section Stage Control.
Staged Loading Creation
Duration of Each Stage
The duration of each stage controls the modulus of elasticity used at that stage ‐ it is assumed that a normal cement is used so that concrete elastic modulus, Ec at age t is estimated by:

The significance of the stage duration on Ec is illustrated below:
- Duration 1 day 0.59 Ec(28)
- Duration 15 days 0.96 Ec(28)
- Duration 28 days 1.00 Ec(28)
- Duration 99 days 1.06 Ec(28)
From the above it can be seen that changes due to duration do not have a large impact on the results after the first few days.
Analysis Properties
The Modulus of Elasticity Factor in particular requires careful consideration as it should be employed in order to make any allowances for creep and cracking. The value entered here is applied to the short term modulus of elasticity Ec(28) defined in Material dialog.
Any allowance for creep is only dealt with effectively in the context of an unstaged analysis.
The E value adopted is very important in relation to sway sensitivity assessment for EC2 (and for other codes also if the ACI sway option is used).
Effect of Staged Construction Analysis on a
Model with Transfer Members
We tested a simple
model to illustrate the effect of staged construction on the transfer beam
bending moments.
a) Stage duration set
to 15 days for all storeys.

b) Stage duration set
to 15 days for Storey 1, and 3 days for Storeys 2 and 3

c) Analysis without
staged construction

From the results
above, we understand that with stage construction, there will be another set of
load combination which is the stage load combination.
The transfer beam is
then designed based on the envelope load combinations, which
consider the most critical effects from all load combinations, including those
generated during staged construction.
As shown in Case (c),
where staged construction is not considered, the sagging (bottom) bending
moment at mid-span is lower than in the cases where staged construction effects
are included. This indicates that the transfer beam design takes into account the
loading effects that occur during the construction sequence.
There is only a small
difference between Cases (a) and (b). This is because this model has a very
regular layout. In addition, the stage duration mainly affects the concrete age
and stiffness development, which, in this example, has a relatively minor
influence on the resulting bending moments.
Therefore, although the intermediate stage
results are not available for viewing, the final design of the transfer beam
incorporates the critical effects arising from staged construction through the
stage load combinations included in the envelope design.